Here’s PART 1 of the story …
The following article is the unedited version of the one appearing in the UML Connector. Please click on the photographs to see the larger versions. Article and photos are by George DeLuca.
September 11, 2015 – The UMass Lowell River Hawks came to ‘ready to play’ against the Lafayette Leopards at Cushing Field on Friday, but fell short, losing 1-0. Both teams fought hard for the win, but Lafayette was able to hold off an onslaught of furious River Hawk attacks in the second half. It was another heartbreaking loss for the home team, but there were many positives about this game that will hopefully pay dividends as the season continues to unfold.
Lafayette controlled possession for much of the first half, before freshman midfielder, Katie Brannigan of Lancashire, England scored at 11:22 on a rebound off River Hawk freshman goalie Julia Schneider (3 saves). Schneider had one of her best games of the season, looking poised and confident throughout the game. At 6:20 of the first half, Lafayette was awarded a free kick which sailed towards the upper right corner. But Schneider timed her jump perfectly to corral the ball, energizing her teammates who responded by raising the level of their collective game.
“I think we absorbed a lot of pressure in the first half,” said River Hawk Coach Joel Bancroft. “If you start to break down where they had the ball it was more out on the flanks. They were serving balls in the box that we felt were not going to be dangerous and that was the key. The balls were scooped up by the goaltender and we countered out of that. I don’t have a lot of concern about being in our own end in the first half. We were figuring things out, and, we had a couple of effective counter attacks as well.”
As the second half began, the River Hawks wrestled control of the game from the Leopards, outperforming their adversaries with a heightened spirit. Suddenly, UMass Lowell players in all field positions were swarming around Lafayette players on all parts of the field. By working together and gelling as a team, the River Hawks were able to control the play for much of the second half. As a result, the Leopards made mental errors resulting in offside penalties and turnovers.
The River Hawks kept the ball in the Lafayette end, somewhat mirroring the success the Leopards had in the first half by executing a series of coordinated drives with determination, focus, and precision. Although Lafayette was able to make the adjustments needed to get back in the game, both teams played tenaciously the rest of the way. UMass Lowell won a moral victory by showing that they can play effectively with teams sporting winning records (Lafayette is now 4-1).
Perhaps the biggest takeaway for the coaching staff was that the River Hawks recovered after a somewhat tumultuous first half, while sustaining their intensity level for the entire game. The team’s drop in energy level and lack of a sense of urgency has been a troubling factor in previous defeats, as they seemed to have trouble with stamina, running out of steam during key moments in previous games.
When asked for his thoughts about the reason for this surge in productivity, Coach Bancroft said, “I think that it’s the chemistry of the personnel that’s playing. We made some changes late in the Holy Cross game, putting in younger players who hadn’t really been given a shot, and we allowed them to play a little more today. They played with a little more bite, with a little more sense of urgency. We tapped them on the shoulder, and I thought they responded well.”
Sophomore forward Shannon Groffie (3 shots) showed leadership, raising the level of her game as injuries took two key players out of the game. Unfortunately, starting sophomore midfielder Rachel Morrier who has three goals so far this year was one of those players on the injured list. River Hawk ‘Captain’ and senior back Colleen Corlis went down with an injury five minutes into the game. Freshman midfielder Maddie Walsh (3 shots) helped compensate as she caught fire, playing with grit and abandon while sparking her teammates, who responded in kind with a rally. As a result, the River Hawks began to band together keeping the ball in the Lafayette end for much of the second half.
When asked about the impact of the loss of key players, Coach Bancroft responded, “You don’t replace a player like Rachel Morrier, so we had to adjust. Does the complexion change if she’s in the match? I’m quite sure it does. After losing our ‘Captain’ Colleen Corlis early in the game and forward Katelyn Vieira late in the game, we had to adjust again. We overcame a lot of adversity, but not enough to get a result.”
UMass Lowell now goes on the road for four games, facing Wagner, Bryant, Central Connecticut, and Dartmouth before returning to Cushing Field to face Quinnipiac on Monday, September 28, before settling into an eight game homestretch against America East teams in October.
Coach Bancroft said, “Those are the games that if you weigh one versus the other, every team has to do well in their conference because that’s how you gain entrance into the NCAA tournament. We certainly don’t want to lose out of conference matches either, but I think that the schedule we put together being so strong is going to prepare us well for what looks to be a very strong America East schedule and hopefully we can complete.”
Coach Bancroft was pleased with his team’s performance, and he was hopeful that the team’s progress and momentum will carry forward, “I thought we worked really hard, and if we continue to work at that level, things are going to change in the wins and lost column, and I’m looking forward to getting back on the field on Sunday.”
9/6/2015 – The UMass Lowell Field Hockey squad’s record improved to 4 wins, 0 losses last night at Cushing “Wicked Blue Field.” The Riverhawks seem to be intent on raising their game with each showing. As midfielders and backs deployed the swarming bee defense for UML goalie Kelsey Federico (another inspiring performance), their offense reaped the rewards of a strategy that included “camping out” in front of the opposing goal.
Meanwhile, junior midfielder/forward Georgia Cowderoy (one assist) displayed her best Bobby Orr style, taking the puck, er ball, from one end of the field to the other as she scampered around (or squeezed between) opposing players then dished to waiting comrades who gravitated into pesky little coagulations in front of the opposing goal.
On this night, UML senior forward Jenna Freitas stepped up her game, finding ways to position herself in front of the Holy Cross goalie ala the great Phil Esposito of the early 1970s Stanley Cup Bruins. Freitas scored both goals for the Riverhawks in their 2-1 victory as the UML defense stymied Holy Cross advances on all parts of the field.
But it was “G” Cowderoy’s leadership, speed, and stick handling that drove the Riverhawks to victory. They now face a four game road trip to UMass, Brown, Hofstra, and New Hampshire, before returning home on Sunday, September 27 to face Harvard.
We are all one people are we not? Modern humans emerged from Africa over 60,000 years ago and proceeded to invade and populate all parts of the inhabitable world. This is the first part of a series that contemplates our journey from the origins of the universe to where we are now and where we appear to be headed as a global civilization.
Dare we say we are all one? If you live in Lowell, Massachusetts you may be so inclined. Historically speaking, Lowell is a global city if you consider its evolution since the mid-nineteenth century when immigrants came in droves for the opportunity to work in the textile mills. But why do people continue to come to Lowell today long after the mills closed and left the City? Let’s begin our introspection with a meditation about the evolution of India.
From its oceanic and geologic origins as a subcontinent crashing into South Asia, India has been fraught with unrest, conflict, and turmoil. About 50 million years ago, a seismic collision of land masses caused the great Himalaya Mountains to rise up into the clouds as the subcontinent continued its northern advance. The process continues today.
About 60,000 years ago, Homo sapiens overcame Homo erectus in South Asia, in large part due to their advanced skills in making and using projectile weapons. From that time forward, the speedy, nimble, and intelligent modern humans began an invasion that ultimately led to worldwide tumult. Today we stand looking into the abyss of extinction ourselves as the global population reaches 7 billion people and natural resources continue to dwindle. Much of the damage inflicted on the Earth’s ecology and environment is irreversible.
The people of India have endured despite a continuous need to adapt to constantly changing environmental, economic, social, political, religious, and cultural conditions. Such has been the case since the migration of the Indo Aryan Vedic herders from the northern steppe lands through Hindu Kush Mountain passes. Thus begins this story of another human melting pot and its quest for existence and survival.
The Vedic people arrived with horses and chariots, initially settling in a region called the Punjab, a network of river valleys that lie along the Indus River and all its tributaries. Much of this area is now East Pakistan. The mass Vedic migration took place from 1500-600 BC before the new settlers began expanding west along the Ganges River, and south, deep into the subcontinent. The mysterious but once prosperous Harrapan people (3rd to 2nd millennium BC) were already migrating to the east as climate change decimated this once prosperous civilization of agrarians and traders.
The occupation of the Punjab was remarkable because the Vedic people maintained a spiritual philosophy that allowed them to blend with those Harrapans who stayed behind. Although the conquerors retained the rights to the spoils, they evolved via a process of adaptation, collaboration, and cooperation. As a result, a degree of harmony developed among the people. The new arrivals began to mingle, blend, and coexist with the remaining Harrapan people in spite of their vast cultural and spiritual differences.
Today, India is pushing forward as an emerging global economic power. But the 1.28 billion people who now make up the population continue to struggle with political corruption, poverty and disease, internal divisiveness, and external pressures. And the now pervasive religious and cultural differences have served up obstacles to progress.
The dispute with Pakistan over Kashmir persists to this day threatening the future survival of both nations. Commercially there are opportunities. But there’s no clear path to accommodate an autonomous existence in the “modern age of globalization.” There’s hope for the future, but some people of India have decided to seek alternative lifestyles in other lands, especially the U. S. where there appears to be more room for opportunity.
On a recent balmy Sunday afternoon, officials representing the City of Lowell, Massachusetts joined a group of about 100 Indian Americans who joined each other to raise the flag of India in front of City Hall. This annual ritual was a touching tribute to the motherland. Each year, this community commemorates August 15, 1947 as the day India gained its independence from Britain after 200 years of colonized rule. Thus, India negotiated its release from a systematic process of occupation originating in 1498 when Vasco de Gama of Portugal navigated around the southern tip of Africa to establish a maritime trade route from Western Europe to Asia.
Despite a successfully negotiated end to British colonial rule and Jawaharlal Nehru’s “progressive” approach to planning India’s future, a rising tide of unrest overcame the process of transition. After India’s independence became official, the Hindu majority and Muslim minority engaged in a massive face-off exacerbated by deadly confrontations. Mahatma Gandhi was murdered. Industrialization presented what seemed to be an insurmountable set of problems for the fledgling government to resolve. People relocated from state to state to avoid being trapped and targeted in a minority situation.
Once immigrants began arriving in Lowell in the 1970s, few returned to India except to visit family and friends. Weddings are a popular reason for a return visit. According to Lowell residents Simi Hussain and Praven Patel, there are “between four and five thousand” descendents of India now living in Lowell, a community approaching three generations deep. At the flag raising ceremony, several women and men bounced babies in their arms while socializing with friends and other attendees. Children shared in the exuberance of the celebration; some moved freely about, some clung to their parents or stayed close-by.
Pravin Patel said that he arrived in America in 1971 among ninety-eight students and two doctors. He acknowledged that many people in India are stricken by extreme poverty. There’s still a high death rate among children under the age of five. Adversarial views woven into the fabric of the Hindu, Muslim, and Christian populations continue to fuel unrest. Much like the polarization of the U.S. government and elsewhere, political convergence is difficult to achieve.
Even though Lowell is considered home to immigrants from India, this newly adapting community is by no means homogenous. The divisions of the homeland have carried forward, but there have been local attempts to build consensus and a stable political structure.
Simi Hussain’s father-in-law Syed M. Hussain ran unsuccessfully for Lowell City Council in 2009, but he managed to secure a respectable 1,700 votes. When asked why Hussain or others in the community have not run in recent races, Simi relayed a general feeling that the seasoned politicians of Lowell are performing well. Hussain singled out City Councilors Rita Mercier and Bill Samaras as being especially helpful to immigrants in Lowell. But support of the status quo seems to ignore the obvious changing demographics towards a more diverse Lowell of the future.
Simi said that Syed M., a U. S. citizen, is currently visiting in India where he’s politically active as a freedom fighter. He sympathizes with the Telanga Rashtra Samithy (TRS) political party which was spawned by the Telanga Agitation movement in South India in 2001. After 9/11, he formed a coalition called No Place for Hate in Lowell, a movement that led to a proposal to the Lowell City Council. Syed M. is expected to return to Lowell by the end of September.
The current president of India is Shri Pranab Mukherjee of the National Congress Party. Elected in 2012, President Mukherjee has achieved a degree of consensus, improved the international image of India, and garnered the respect of other political parties. Syed M. Hussain met with Deputy Chief Minister of Telangana last week.
Another attendee of the flag raising, Dr. Syed Jaffer Hasan, acknowledged Lowell’s rich heritage. He praised local immigrants from Cambodia as role models with impressive accomplishments. They’ve managed to build a local political infrastructure and Buddhist temples. They’ve also started many businesses, especially in the Lower Highlands and Acre sections of Lowell.
Indian immigrants in Lowell have followed the lead of the enterprising Southeast Asians by opening six or 8 grocery stores in a City proud of its rich tradition of immigrants becoming merchants. This trend harkens back to the nineteenth century, when Greek and Irish immigrants established businesses along the outer Market and Merrimack Street areas in the Acre section of the City.
But according to Hasan, American citizenship is a “gift” that can lead to opportunities, especially when one acquires a first class education. “All my nephews and nieces came and are now doctors, lawyers, and IT professionals.” He gestured to the children moving about at the flag raising ceremony. Many attend Lowell schools today with plans for higher education. After all, the success (and perhaps the survival) of modern humans hinges on freedom, which can only be achieved through education and economic development. But the freedom that emerges from the sustenance of education often dies when mired in a plethora of ignorance.
This article is part of a series about immigrants who have come to Lowell. Anyone who wishes to tell their story or express their views is welcome to contact me by email at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Note: Click on any photo for larger size
Tignor, Adelman, Brown, Elman, Liu, Pittman, Shaw. “Worlds Together, Worlds Apart” Volumes 1 & 2, Fourth Edition, W. W. Norton & Company, New York, London
Trujillo, Alan P. Thurman, Harold V. “Essentials of Oceanography,” Eleventh Edition, Pearson, 2014
“About Telangana Rashtra Samithi,” http://www.elections.in/political-parties-in-india/telangana-rashtra-samithi.html
Address by the President of India, Shri Pranab Mukherjee on the occasion of call on by heads of State/Government participating in 2nd Summit of forum for India-Pacific Island countries (FIPIC), http://presidentofindia.nic.in/speeches-detail.htm?423
Parisian artist Linda McCluskey (formerly of Chelmsford) came upon the trumpet on the left in a music museum in Seborga, Italy (MAP). At first glance, the information on the card doesn’t correlate with historical documentation covering the brisk advancements and innovations in brass instrument technologies developed during the early to mid-nineteenth century.
The card in the photo at right states that in 1820, Nathan Adams made an orchestral trumpet with double piston valves and several tuning crooks.
First, at the time this instrument was reportedly made, Lowell was still East Chelmsford and for the most part farmland. Lowell wasn’t incorporated as a town until 1826, so the oddly shaped trumpet couldn’t have been made in 1820 in “Lowell, Massachusetts.”
Second, the trumpets depicted in the photos above are strikingly similar. Both are double piston “Vienna valve” instruments with tuning crooks.
Third, Leopold Uhlmann of Vienna received a “patent” on the “Vienna valve” in 1830, but this particular valve was invented (also in Vienna) in about 1822 by a man named J. F Riedl. The tuning crooks were designed for orchestral instruments. They’re rare and have profound historical significance.
If you’re a serious student of the history of brass instruments, you can understand the dilemma. The card claims the instrument was made by an American in 1820 … two years before it was supposedly invented by a Viennese instrument maker!
As the industrial revolution went global at the turn of the nineteenth century, there was a frenzy of activity that advanced the technological development of brass instruments. These remarkable improvements made it possible to seamlessly run the scale over several octaves without loss of tonal quality. Nathan Adams was right in the middle of this action.
Adams is best known in brass instrument circles for his introduction of the “rotary valve,” possibly in 1824. It’s becoming more apparent in my research that Nathan Adams created a stir among musical instrument makers (and players) in Europe. He was well traveled and held in high regard in the various circles frequented by the musical elite. But his contributions have yet to be fully acknowledged.
I believe Nathan Adams was involved with the innovations which led to the invention of the “Vienna valve” trumpet. After all he was a machinist and had the capability to recreate, modify, or improve any brass instrument placed in his hands. He was considered a mechanical genius by his peers, colleagues … and especially, his friends. And his contributions to brass instrument development is widely accepted.
More to follow …
ORIGINAL Post July 9, 2015 … REVISED August 14, 2015, 4:26pm
by George DeLuca
Contributors to this post: Linda McCluskey, Paul Early, Mike, and Robb Stewart!
Rosenberg, Chaim M., The Life and Times of Francis Cabot Lowell, 1775-1817, Lexington Books, copyright 2011
Eliason, Robert, “Early American Valves for American Instruments,” The Galpin Society Journal, Vol 23, p86-96, copyright 1970
Stewart, Robb, “1840s Trumpet in F by Leopold Uhlmann,” http://www.robbstewart.com
Photos courtesy of Linda McCluskey and Robb Stewart
City of Lowell
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
By his honor Rodney M. Elliott, Mayor
WHEREAS In the 1870’s thousands of French-Canadians left the farms and towns of Quebec, immigrating to Lowell to find work in the mills and a better life for their families, making this city their new home and enriching its fabric with their culture, traditions and work ethic;
and WHEREAS today, throughout Quebec and other Francophone portions of Canada, Saint Jean Baptiste Day is recognized, honoring St. John the Baptist, the Jewish preacher who baptized Jesus of Nazareth in the Jordan River; and
WHEREAS our Franco-American Monument honors the “memory of all Franco-Americans of the past who helped to build Lowell, to those of the present who are continuing a well and cherished heritage, and to all Franco-Americans of the future who will help to keep Lowell the great city that it is.”
NOW, THEREFORE, I Rodney M. Elliott, Mayor of Lowell, Massachusetts, do hereby proclaim today, Wednesday, June 24, 2015 as: “St. Jean Baptiste Day” and the week of June 21 – June 27 as “Franco-American Week” in the City of Lowell, and encourage all citizens to join in the celebration.
Given this 24th day of June, 2015
Rodney M. Elliott, Mayor, City of Lowell